How did your opinions about what should be done differ before you read the commentaries and after you read them?

  • How did your opinions about what should be done differ before you read the commentaries and after you read them?
  • Which of the commentators’ opinions made the most sense to you? Why?
  • Which parts of the recommendations will you use?
  • Which parts of your recommendation are unique?
  • Provide a full explanation of what you would recommend and why.
  • Provide at least two recent articles from the UOP online library to support your paper.
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *